Bayene v. Farmland Foods
Plaintiff: Tadesse Bayene
Defendant: Farmland Foods
Case Number: 8:2010cv00256
Filed: July 12, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: F. A. Gossett
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Plaintiff's motion to reopen case (Filing 31 ) is denied. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Filing 32 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
July 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 23 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
June 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying the plaintiff's 18 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's Notice of Appeal 17 is untimely. The clerk of the court shall not process the appeal to the Court of Appeals. The clerk of the court is directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the parties and to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party and as directed) (MKR)
February 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER denying 15 the plaintiff's motion objecting to dismissal, construed as a motion for reconsideration. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
November 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION on the court's own motion. For these reasons, and for the reasons set forth in the Courts September 22, 2010, memorandum and order, this matter will be dismissed. A separate order will be entered in accordance with this memorandum opinion. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
September 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff shall have until October 21, 2010, to file sufficient evidence with the Court showing that the amount in controversy is greater than $75,000.00, the jurisdictional amount. The Clerk of the court is directed to se t a pro se case management deadline. ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 10/21/2010 - deadline for plaintiff to allege and show jurisdictional amount by preponderance of evidence.) Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAE)
August 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER provisionally granting 2 the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, and the complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bayene v. Farmland Foods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tadesse Bayene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Farmland Foods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?