Melena v. Nanfito et al
| Audrey Melena |
| Dawn Coffey, John Doe, John Does, Edna, John, Genovive Nanfito and Jacie Victor |
| 8:2010cv00290 |
| August 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff failed to respond to the court's September 20, 2010, Memorandum and Order requiring that she provide the court with a current address. This action is therefore dismissed without prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Plaintiff shall have until 10/20/10 to apprise the court of her current address, in the absence of which this case will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk is directed to set a pro se case management deadline for 10/20/2010: deadline for informing court of new address. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
