Wells v. Norfork Regenal Center
Mr. Robin O. Wells |
Norfork Regenal Center |
8:2010cv00301 |
August 13, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Pro Se Docket |
Richard G. Kopf |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff has not responded to this court's orders. This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB) |
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff shall have until January 5, 2011, to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this case will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: January 5, 2011: deadline for informing court of new address.Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL ) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Complaint 1 filed by Robin O. Wells. After initial review, by January 14, 2011, Wells must either (1) submit an affidavit or other evidence showing that he is the personal representative of his son's estate or (2) substitute the personal representative of his son's estate as plaintiff. By January 14, 2011, Wells must submit an affidavit or other evidence that proves he is the sole beneficiary and creditor of the estate. In the alternative, Wells may obta in counsel. Plaintiff shall keep the court informed of his current address at all times while this case is pending. Failure to do so may result in dismissal without further notice. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 1/14/2011: Check for affidavit or other evidence. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff shall have until October 20, 2010, to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this case will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: October 20, 2010: deadline for informing court of new address. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER provisionally granting 2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wells v. Norfork Regenal Center | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Norfork Regenal Center | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mr. Robin O. Wells | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.