Bradley v. Stoxstell et al
| Juan Bradley |
| Kelly Bradley, Sheila Bradley, Brenda Stoxstell, Charlotte Stoxstell and Maurice Stoxstell |
| 8:2010cv00393 |
| October 14, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Lyle E. Strom |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM OPINION - The plaintiff has not shown that he is entitled to proceed IFP, nor has he paid the full $350 filing fee. For these reasons, this matter must be dismissed. A separate order will be entered in accordance with this memorandum opinion. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (AOA)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 2 ) is denied. Plaintiff has until November 18, 2010, to either show cause why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(g) o r pay the full $350.00 filing fee. In the absence of either action by plaintiff, this matter will be dismissed without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: November 18, 2010: Deadline for plaintiff to show cause or pay full filing fee. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
