Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Idahoan Foods, LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Nebraska District Court Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Idahoan Foods, LLC

Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Idahoan Foods, LLC

Plaintiff:	Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:	Idahoan Foods, LLC
Case Number:	8:2010cv00457
Filed:	December 14, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office:	8 Omaha Office
Nature of Suit:	Prop. Damage Prod. Liability
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 1, 2011	Filing 19 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - The Stipulation for dismissal 18 is granted. The above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice to a new action, each party to pay their own costs. The court, being fully advised in the premises, finds that such an order should be entered. The above captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice to a new action, each party to pay their own costs. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (KBJ)
March 1, 2011	Filing 17 ORDER - The parties' Joint Motion to Extend Rule 26 Initial Disclosure Submission (Filing No. 16 ) is granted. The case shall be stayed until further order of this court. The planning conference scheduled for April 21, 2011, is canceled. Couns el shall file a joint status report concerning the status of this case on June 1, 2011, such report to include counsel's position(s) concerning whether the stay should continue in effect or whether the stay should be lifted. Status Report due by 6/1/2011. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 1, 2011

Filing 19 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - The Stipulation for dismissal 18 is granted. The above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice to a new action, each party to pay their own costs. The court, being fully advised in the premises, finds that such an order should be entered. The above captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice to a new action, each party to pay their own costs. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (KBJ)

March 1, 2011

Filing 17 ORDER - The parties' Joint Motion to Extend Rule 26 Initial Disclosure Submission (Filing No. 16 ) is granted. The case shall be stayed until further order of this court. The planning conference scheduled for April 21, 2011, is canceled. Couns el shall file a joint status report concerning the status of this case on June 1, 2011, such report to include counsel's position(s) concerning whether the stay should continue in effect or whether the stay should be lifted. Status Report due by 6/1/2011. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Idahoan Foods, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Idahoan Foods, LLC
Represented By:	Justin W. High
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Represented By:	Kyle Wallor
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?