Whittington v. Legent Clearing, L.L.C.
| Amy J. Whittington |
| Legent Clearing, L.L.C. |
| 8:2010cv00465 |
| December 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Thomas D. Thalken |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER OF DISMISSAL- The 89 Joint Stipulation for Dismissal is sustained. This matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay her/its own costs, complete record waived. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER-Upon notice of settlement given to the magistrate judge on May 3, 2012, by Justin D. Eichmann, counsel for the plaintiff, On or before June 4, 2012, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, at bataillon@ned.uscourts.gov, a draft order which will fully dispose of the case. If the case is being dismissed, the stipulation shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) and shall state whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. The pretrial conference and trial previously scheduled are cancelled and all pending motions are terminated upon the representation that this case is settled. ( Dismissal Papers Deadline due by 6/4/2012.). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER granting 33 Motion to Compel. The plaintiff shall have until December 22, 2011, to supplement her responses to Interrogatory Nos. 1 and 3. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL)
|
|
Filing
26
AMENDED ORDER SETTING FINAL SCHEDULE FOR PROGRESSION OF CASE - The defendant's Unopoosed Motion for Extension of Deadline to file motion for summary judgment 23 is granted as set forth in this Order. Jury Trial set, at the court's call, the week of 6/11/2012 before Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/11/2012 at 03:30 PM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (KBJ)
|
|
Filing
20
PROTECTIVE ORDER granting 18 Motion for Protective Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Whittington v. Legent Clearing, L.L.C. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Legent Clearing, L.L.C. | |
| Represented By: | Gillian G. O'Hara |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amy J. Whittington | |
| Represented By: | Bradford & Coenen LLC |
| Represented By: | Justin D. Eichmann |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
