Sitko et al v. Mumm et al
Cynthia Sitko and Joseph G. Sitko |
Curt Mumm and Kieffer C. Mumm |
8:2011cv00007 |
January 12, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Lyle E. Strom |
Thomas D. Thalken |
Motor Vehicle |
23 U.S.C. ยง 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER - The stipulation 28 is approved and adopted; this action is dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay its own costs. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (AOA) |
Filing 26 ORDER - This matter is before the Court on the motion of Angela J. Miller to withdraw as counsel of record for plaintiff 25 . The Court finds said motion should be granted. The motion is granted; Angela J. Miller is deemed withdrawn as counsel for plaintiff. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (KBJ) |
Filing 24 AMENDED FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER granting 23 Stipulation regarding Unopposed Motion to Extend Order Setting Schedule for Progression of a Civil Case. Jury Trial continued to 3/6/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, Federal Building, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, NE before Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom., Pretrial Conference continued to 2/7/2012 at 10:00 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TCL ) |
Filing 13 ORDER - Scheduling Conference set for 2/17/2011 08:15 AM in Chambers before Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TCL ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.