Gilliland et al v. Harley-Davidson Motor Company Group, LLC
Luis S. Gallegos, Denise M. Gilliland and Terrence N. Gilliland |
Harley-Davidson Motor Company Group, LLC |
8:2011cv00011 |
January 18, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Laurie Smith Camp |
F.A. Gossett |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 AMENDED ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT - Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 34 ) is granted. This case is dismissed without prejudice. The parties will bear their own costs and attorney fees. Ordered by Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JAB) |
Filing 27 CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER - This matter is before the court on the parties' Joint Stipulation for a confidential protective order, filing 25 . The stipulation will be adopted as set out in this order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (GJG) |
Filing 14 ORDER TO AMEND CASE CAPTION - In its answer (Doc. 5 ), the defendant advised that its proper name is "Harley-Davidson Motor Company Group, LLC." The parties subsequently agreed. Therefore, the Clerk shall amend the records of the court and the caption of this case to reflect that the defendant is "Harley-Davidson Motor Company Group, LLC," rather than "Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Co." Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (JAB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.