Lathrop v. Britton
| Daniel J. Lathrop |
| Attorney General of Nebraska and Fred Britten |
| Nebraska Attorney General |
| 8:2011cv00032 |
| February 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying as duplicative the Petitioner's 21 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. The Clerk of the court is directed not to process Petitioners duplicative Notice of Appeal and to send a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copies mailed as directed and to pro se party) (MKR)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (filing no. 14 ) is granted. Petitioner's Notice of Appeal, liberally construed as a request for a certificate of appealability (filing no. 13 ) is denied without prejudice to reassertion before the Eighth Circuit. The Clerk of the court shall provide the Court of Appeals a copy of this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (AOA)
|
|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner Daniel J. Lathrop's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing no. 1 ) is dismissed with prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Clerk of court is directed to mail copies of this Memorandum and Order and the Petition to Respondents and the Nebraska Attorney General. By April 18, 2011, Respondents shall file a motion for summary judgment or state cou rt records in support of an answer. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: April 18, 2011: deadline for Respondents to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. If Respondents elect to file an answer, the following procedures shall be followed by Respondents and Petitioner: A. By April 18, 2011, Respondents shall file all state court records which are relevant to the cognizable claims . See, e.g., Rule 5(c)- (d) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Those records shall be contained in a separate filing entitled: "Designation of State Court Records In Support of Answer." The Cler k of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: May 18, 2011: check for Respondents to file answer and separate brief. Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (filing no. 2 ) is denied. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copies mailed as directed)(GJG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
