-PRSE Ajamu v. Douglas County District Court
| Ojore Mulumba Ajamu, VII |
| Douglas County District Court |
| Nebraska Attorney General |
| 8:2011cv00049 |
| February 17, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Petitioner failed to prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with this courts orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (MKR)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner is directed to correct the above-listed technical defect in the Petition on or before March 18, 2011. Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to send to Petitioner the Form AO240, Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case with the following text: March 18, 2011: deadline to submit IFP application or pay $5.00 filing fee. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party with AO240 form )(TCL )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
