EMS, Inc. v. Chegg, Inc.

EMS, Inc. v. Chegg, Inc.

Plaintiff:	EMS, Inc.
Defendant:	Chegg, Inc.
Case Number:	8:2011cv00113
Filed:	March 29, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office:	8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge:	Joseph F. Bataillon
Presiding Judge:	Thomas D. Thalken
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Recovery/Enforcement
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 6, 2012	Filing 47 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The defendant's motion for partial summary judgment (Filing No. 33 ) is denied. The defendant's motion is limine (Filing No. 30 ) is denied without prejudice to reassertion at trial. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (GJG)
January 11, 2012	Filing 18 AMENDED ORDER SETTING FINAL SCHEDULE FOR PROGRESSION OF CASE - The parties' Joint Motion for Modification of Final Progression Order (Filing No. 16 ) is granted, in part, as set forth herein. All depositions, whether or not they are intende d to be used at trial, shall be completed by May 8, 2012. The Final Pretrial Conference with the undersigned magistrate judge is set for June 15, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. in chambers, Suite 2271, Roman L. Hruska United States Courthouse, 111 South 18th P laza, Omaha, Nebraska. Trial is set to commence, at the court's call, during the week of July 23, 2012, in Omaha, Nebraska, before the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon and a jury. The trial is expected to last three to four day. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 6, 2012

Filing 47 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The defendant's motion for partial summary judgment (Filing No. 33 ) is denied. The defendant's motion is limine (Filing No. 30 ) is denied without prejudice to reassertion at trial. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (GJG)

January 11, 2012

Filing 18 AMENDED ORDER SETTING FINAL SCHEDULE FOR PROGRESSION OF CASE - The parties' Joint Motion for Modification of Final Progression Order (Filing No. 16 ) is granted, in part, as set forth herein. All depositions, whether or not they are intende d to be used at trial, shall be completed by May 8, 2012. The Final Pretrial Conference with the undersigned magistrate judge is set for June 15, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. in chambers, Suite 2271, Roman L. Hruska United States Courthouse, 111 South 18th P laza, Omaha, Nebraska. Trial is set to commence, at the court's call, during the week of July 23, 2012, in Omaha, Nebraska, before the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon and a jury. The trial is expected to last three to four day. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EMS, Inc. v. Chegg, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Chegg, Inc.
Represented By:	Michael S. Degan
Represented By:	David M. Newman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: EMS, Inc.
Represented By:	Joseph C. Byam
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?