United States of America v. Schroeder et al
| United States of America |
| Scott A. Schroeder and Patricia J. Kortje |
| 8:2011cv00117 |
| March 31, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Thomas D. Thalken |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Foreclosure |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF FORECLOSURE AND ORDER OF SALE - Granting Plaintiff's Motion for default judgment 16 against Patricia J. Kortje and Scott A. Schroeder. In the principal sum of $85,098.87, plus accrued interest in the amount of � 36;14,187.51, together with interest accruing at the rate of $16.3165 per day from October 5, 2011, and $37.35 in late charges, until the date of entry of this decree. Interest will accrue on said sums from and after the date of entry of this decree at the legal rate of 0.12% computed daily and compounded annually until paid in full. Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (1 Certified copy to USM) (Copies mailed to defendant via US Mail) (AOA)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER - This matter is before the court on the plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Summons and Complaint 6 . Upon good cause shown, the plaintiff's motion is granted. The plaintiff shall have until November 28, 2011, to complete service upon the defendant Scott A. Schroeder. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (KBJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
