Roberts v. City of Omaha et al
Plaintiff: David Roberts
Defendant: City of Omaha, Erich Jones, Josh Martinec, Omaha Police Department, Justin Raders and Phillip Ricker
Case Number: 8:2011cv00129
Filed: April 7, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bataillon
Presiding Judge: Thomas D. Thalken
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 182 ORDER to Withdraw Exhibits or Show Cause Why Exhibits Should Not Be Destroyed regarding plaintiff's exhibits from trial held February 9-13, 2015. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)
February 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 155 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's motion to reconsider, Filing No. 153 is granted in part as set forth in this order. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL)
February 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 152 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: The plaintiff's motion to amend the witness list and exhibit list (Filing No. 143 ) is granted, subject to objections at trial. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL )
August 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER granting 105 Motion to Compel. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (ADB)
September 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER that this case is stayed pending the plaintiff's election to file a writ of certiorari. If the plaintiff files a writ of certiorari, the case is stayed until resolution of the matter by the United States Supreme Court. After either the res olution of the matter by the United States Supreme Court or the time for filing a writ has passed without such filing, the plaintiff shall have ten days to schedule a pretrial conference with the undersigned magistrate judge and participating counsel. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (JSF)
October 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 82 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: The defendants' motion to amend their motion for summary judgment to assert the defense of qualified immunity, Filing No. 71 , is granted. The defendants' motion in limine, Filing No. 59 , is over ruled at this time, without prejudice to its reassertion via timely objection to the admissibility of such evidence at trial. The defendants' motion for summary judgment, Filing No. 32 , is granted in part and denied in part, consistent with this opinion.Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roberts v. City of Omaha et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Omaha
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Erich Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Josh Martinec
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Omaha Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Justin Raders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phillip Ricker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Roberts
Represented By: Christine A. Lustgarten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?