Mason v. Hotshot Deliveries, Inc.

Mason v. Hotshot Deliveries, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Noelle Mason
Defendant:	Hotshot Deliveries, Inc.
Case Number:	8:2011cv00190
Filed:	May 25, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office:	8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge:	Joseph F. Bataillon
Presiding Judge:	Thomas D. Thalken
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 18, 2012	Filing 41 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - This action is hereby dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear her or its own attorneys' fees and costs. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TEL)
May 18, 2012	Filing 39 ORDER - On or before June 18, 2012, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, at bataillon@ned.uscourts.gov, a draft ord er which will fully dispose of the case. If the case is being dismissed, the stipulation shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) and shall state whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice. Absent compliance with this order, this case (i ncluding all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. The pretrial conference and trial previously scheduled are cancelled and all pending motions are terminated upon the representation that this case is settled. (Dismissal Papers Deadline due by 6/18/2012.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TEL)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 18, 2012

Filing 41 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - This action is hereby dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear her or its own attorneys' fees and costs. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TEL)

May 18, 2012

Filing 39 ORDER - On or before June 18, 2012, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, at bataillon@ned.uscourts.gov, a draft ord er which will fully dispose of the case. If the case is being dismissed, the stipulation shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) and shall state whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice. Absent compliance with this order, this case (i ncluding all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. The pretrial conference and trial previously scheduled are cancelled and all pending motions are terminated upon the representation that this case is settled. (Dismissal Papers Deadline due by 6/18/2012.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TEL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mason v. Hotshot Deliveries, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Noelle Mason
Represented By:	Patrick M. Flood
Represented By:	Michael R. Peterson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Hotshot Deliveries, Inc.
Represented By:	William R. Settles
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?