Widtfeldt v. United States of America et al
| State of Nebraska, United States Dep't of Agriculture, United States of America, Farm Service Agency and Internal Revenue Service |
| James Widtfeldt |
| 8:2011cv00214 |
| June 9, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that this matter is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute diligently and for failure to comply with this court's orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(ADB, )
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Plaintiff shall have until February 10, 2012, to show cause why this case should not be dismissed. If Plaintiff does not respond, or if good cause is not shown, this action will be dismissed without prejudice and witho ut further notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline with the following text: February 10, 2012: deadline for Plaintiff to show cause why service of process was not completed. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(ADB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
