Poe v. U.S. Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Sherry Poe
Defendant:
Unites States Postal Service
Case Number:
8:2011cv00222
Filed:
June 21, 2011
Court:
Nebraska District Court
Office:
8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge:
Joseph F. Bataillon
Referring Judge:
Thomas D. Thalken
Nature of Suit:
Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action:
28:1346 Tort Claim
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
April 13, 2012 | 42 |
![]() |
March 13, 2012 | 38 |
![]() |
December 1, 2011 | 33 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Poe v. U.S. Postal Service | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Unites States Postal Service | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sherry Poe | |
Represented By: | Steven M. Lathrop |
Represented By: | David M. O'Neill |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.