Stalp et al v. Excellus Health Plan, Inc.
Christopher Stalp, Joyce Stalp and Timothy Stalp |
Excellus Health Plan, Inc. |
8:2011cv00226 |
June 22, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Joseph F. Bataillon |
Thomas D. Thalken |
Insurance |
12 U.S.C. ยง 635 Breach of Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER OF DISMISSAL- This matter is dismissed with prejudice. Pursuant to agreement, each party is responsible for its own costs.Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR) |
Filing 43 ORDER upon notice of settlement given to the magistrate judge on November 19, 2013. On or before December 19, 2013, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, at bataillon@ned.uscourts.gov, a draft order which will fully dispose of the case. If the case is being dismissed, the stipulation shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) and shall state whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. The previously scheduled status conference is cancelled upon th e representation that this case is settled. ( Dismissal Papers Deadline due by 12/19/2013.) Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR) |
Filing 27 ORDER- The defendants motion for partial summary judgment (Filing No. 16 ) is granted. The plaintiffs objection thereto (Filing No. 24 ) is denied. The plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint within 14 days of the date of this order. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR) |
Filing 15 ORDER following a telephone conference with counsel on February 3, 2012. The defendant shall file its motion for partial summary judgment on or before March 1, 2012. The plaintiffs shall have to on or before March 23, 2012, to file a response to the motion for partial summary judgment. The defendant may file a reply in support of its motion on or before April 2, 2012. Within ten days following the courts ruling on the motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff shall arrange a telephone conference with opposing counsel and the undersigned magistrate judge for the purpose of scheduling the matter to conclusion. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.