Furr v. Cellco Partnership et al
| Stephen Furr, Jr. |
| WWC License LLC and Cellco Partnership |
| 8:2011cv00251 |
| July 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Lyle E. Strom |
| Thomas D. Thalken |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER - The stipulation 44 is approved and adopted. This action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the terms of the stipulation. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER - The motion, filing 27 is granted. Plaintiff shall until July 17, 2012, to submit declarations in opposition to the motion for summary judgment. Defendant shall have until July 24, 2012, to file a reply brief, if it wishes to do so. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER adopting 15 Joint Stipulation. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER regarding Stipulation for Dismissal 16 . The stipulation is approved and adopted; this action is dismissed with prejudice as to WWC License LLC, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, each party to bear their own costs and attorney fees. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER - Scheduling Conference set for 9/14/2011 08:15 AM in Chambers before Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TCL )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
