QA3 Financial Corp. v. Feliciana Bank and Trust Company et al.
| QA3 Financial Corp. |
| Feliciana Bank ant Trust Company Profit Sharing Plan, Catlin Speciality Insurance Company and Feliciana Bank and Trust Company |
| U.S. Bankruptcy Court |
| U.S. Trustee |
| Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of QA3 Financial Corp. |
| 8:2011cv00327 |
| September 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Bankruptcy Court's July 1, 2011, Relief from Stay Order (bankr. ct. filing 150) and August 22, 2011, Reconsideration Order (bankr. ct. filing 173) are affirmed. A separate Judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (AOA)
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Appellant's motion to change caption (filing 9 ) is granted. Hereafter, the parties may use the following caption for any pleadings filed in this matter: QA3 Financial Corp., Appellant, v. Catlin Specialty Insurance Company, Appellee. The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors' motion for leave to file brief as amicus curiae (filing 11 ) is granted. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (AOA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
