Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. GMT, LLC
| Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| GMT, LLC |
| 8:2011cv00336 |
| September 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| F.A. Gossett |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
CONSENT DECREE Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER continuing the subpoenaed depositions for next week (9/11-12).Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)
|
|
Filing
42
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The plaintiff intervenors and the defendants joint motion for dismissal with prejudice, (ECF No. 41 ), is granted; the complaint in intervention, (ECF No. 19 ), is dismissed with prejudice; and the plaintiff intervenors and the defendants shall each bear their own attorneys fees and costs.Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)
|
|
Filing
39
PROTECTIVE ORDER -- Order entertering Protective Order pursuant to filing no. 36 . Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (BHC)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting 37 Motion for Protective Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (Zwart, Cheryl)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER granting 24 Motion for Protective Order and denying 28 Motion for Reconsideration. The parties shall confer and attempt in good faith to stipulate to the terms of a protective order and submit the proposed order to this court by July 27, 2012 for approval. Absent an agreement by the parties, the court will enter a protective order consistent with the practices of this district. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (BHC)
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 9 Motion to Intervene. The plaintiff and defendant have not filed any opposition to the motion, and the deadline for doing so has passed. Moreover, counsel for the proposed intervening parties participated in the par ties' planning conference and signed the Rule 26(f) Report filed of record (filing no. 11 ) as counsel for the intervening parties. The motion to intervene is therefore deemed unopposed. Accordingly, The complaint of the intervening parties, a copy of which is attached to their motion, shall be filed on or before February 21, 2012. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. GMT, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GMT, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | |
| Represented By: | Dayna F. Deck |
| Represented By: | C. Felix Miller |
| Represented By: | Barbara A. Seely |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
