Miller v. United States of America
||Eric V. Miller
||United States of America
||October 17, 2011
||US District Court for the District of Nebraska
||8 Omaha Office
||Pro Se Docket
||Richard G. Kopf
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus (General)
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 31, 2012
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 filed by Eric V. Miller. Following initial review, the court finds it does not have jurisdiction over Miller's § 2241 petition, and Miller has not received authorization to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. Therefore, Miller's Petition (Filing No. 1 ) is dismissed without prejudice. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(JAB)
|November 21, 2011
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 filed by Eric V. Miller. Petitioner has failed to include the $5.00 filing fee. Petitioner has the choice of either tendering the $5.00 fee to the Clerk of the court or su bmitting a request to proceed in forma pauperis and an affidavit of poverty in support thereof. Petitioner is directed to correct the above-listed technical defect in the Petition on or before December 21, 2011. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines set for 12/21/2011: deadline to submitIFP application or pay $5.00 filing fee. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party with form)(JAB)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?