Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The Timken Company et al
Plaintiff: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant: The Timken Company, John Doe Corporation(s) 1 Through 100 and Meridian Rail Services
Case Number: 8:2011cv00373
Filed: October 28, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: F.A. Gossett
Nature of Suit: Prop. Damage Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 121 ORDER - Motion, filing 120 , is granted. Defendants shall have until October 14, 2013, to disclose expert witnesses. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (GJG)
September 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER granting 107 Motion for an extension of time to respond to the Timken Company's motion for summary judgment 90 . Plaintiff shall have until September 18, 2013, to respond to Timken's motion for summary judgment. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (GJG)
August 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER granting 98 Motion to Extend. Plaintiff shall have until September 13, 2013, to respond to Timken's motion for summary judgment. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (GJG)
July 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER - Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend amended complaint, filing 87 is granted. Plaintiff shall have until August 9, 2013, to file its second amended complaint. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (GJG)
March 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER granting 83 joint motion to continue trial and discovery. The progression order (Filing No. 30 ) is vacated, and discovery is stayed pending mediation. The parties shall file a status report with the Court on or before June 12, 2013, together with a proposed scheduling order, if mediation is not successful. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (GJG)
February 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER regarding filing 77 . The stipulation of the parties is approved and adopted. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (GJG)
September 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER - The Stipulation of the parties, filing 63 , is approved and adopted. The plaintiff shall have until February 22, 2013, to identify all expert witnesses and serve the statement required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2) regarding each expert witne ss it expects to call to testify at trial. The defendants shall have until March 22, 2013, to identify all expert witnesses and serve the statement required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2) regarding each expert witness they expect to call to testify at trial. Plaintiff's deadline to serve rebuttal expert reports, if any, remains on April 19, 2013. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (GJG)
August 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 62 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TEL)
March 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER - Plaintiff's motion 37 is granted. Plaintiff shall have until March 9, 2012, to file its second amended complaint. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (GJG)
January 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER - Case No. 8:12CV4, Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Meridian Rail Acquisition Corp., et al., is reassigned to Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom for disposition and remains assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (TEL)
January 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER - Scheduling Conference set for 1/19/2012 08:15 AM in Chambers before Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TCL )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The Timken Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Represented By: Sarah F. Macdissi
Represented By: Kyle Wallor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Timken Company
Represented By: William S. Cline
Represented By: J. Scott Paul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe Corporation(s) 1 Through 100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Meridian Rail Services
Represented By: Andre R. Barry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?