Door v. Omaha Police Department et al
Duop Door |
Omaha Police Department and John D. Bahle |
8:2011cv00390 |
November 16, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Joseph F. Bataillon |
Pro Se Docket |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Complaint (filing no. 1 ) is dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (TEL) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff Duop Door shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $3.50 by 1/27/2012, unless an enlargement of time is granted in response to a written motion. If the initial partial filing fee is not received by the specified deadline, this case will be dismissed. After payment of the initial partial filing fee, Plaintiff's institution shall collect the additional monthly payments in the manner se t forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), quoted above, and shall forward those installments to the court. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 1/27/2012: initial partial filing fee payment due) (Copy mailed to Plaintiff's institution as directed.) (TEL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.