QA3 Financial Corp. et al v. Financial Network Investment Corporation et al
Plaintiff: QA3 Financial Corp., QA3 Financial, LLC, QA3, LLC and Quantum Insurance Design, LLC
Defendant: Multi-Financial Securities Corporation, Cetera Financial Group and Financial Network Investment Corporation
Case Number: 8:2012cv00005
Filed: January 5, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Laurie Smith Camp
Presiding Judge: F.A. Gossett
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery/Enforcement
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - IT IS ORDERED that for good cause shown, (1) the Stipulation of Dismissal is hereby approved; and (2) all of Plaintiffs' claims and causes of action asserted against Defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party paying its own fees and costs. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL)
July 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER upon notice of settlement given to the magistrate judge on July 30, 2014, by counsel for the plaintiff's. On or before September 29, 2014, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stip ulation) and shall submit to the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, at bataillon@ned.uscourts.gov, a draft order which will fully dispose of the case. If the case is being dismissed, the stipulation shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) and sha ll state whether the dismissal is with or without prejudice. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. ***Set All Deadlines: ( Dismissal Papers Deadline due by 9/29/2014.) Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 83 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -Defendant's motion for summary judgment 75 is denied. 75 The parties shall contact Magistrate Judge Zwart's chambers within ten (10) days of the date of this order to schedule a conference addressing the further progression of this case. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)
May 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER that Attorney Thomas Dahlk has a pending case in this court and has not paid the 2013/2014 Attorney Assessment. Within 30 days from the date of this order, Mr. Dahlk is directed to pay the $20.00 fee or show cause why he is unable to do so. Show Cause Deadline set for 6/27/2014. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (MTB)
April 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 81 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The pretrial conference and jury trial are continued pending further order of the court. The parties shall contact the undersigned's chambers within ten (10) days after the ruling of the motion for summary judgment to schedule a conference addressing the further progression of this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (MKR)
June 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER OF RECUSAL because of a possible appearance of impropriety in my handling this case, this matter is referred to the Chief Judge for reassignment. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (MKR)
March 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 49 the defendants motion to dismiss. To the extent that Count IV alleges an unjust enrichment claim based on the theory that the plaintiffs were damaged by their decision not to pursue negotiations with other broker dealers, Count IV is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. In all other respects, the defendants motion to dismiss is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (EJL)
December 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 55 RECUSAL ORDER on the court's own motion pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 455(a), which states: "Any... judge... of the United States shall disqualify [her]self in anyproceeding in which [her] impartiality might reasonably be questioned." While the impartiality of the undersigned in all actions taken in this case up to this date would not reasonably be subject to question, disqualification from future involvement in the case is warranted under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a). Accordingly, the undersigned Judge does recuse herself from the above-designated case. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (MKR)
November 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER granting Victoia H. Buter's 42 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. The Clerk of Court shall terminate the appearance of Victoria H. Buter as counsel for Plaintiffs and shall terminate future notices to her in this matter. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (MKR)
November 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER granting the Plaintiff's 35 Motion to Amend Complaint. Plaintiff's shall file their amended complaint by or before November 5, 2012. Amended Complaint due by 11/5/2012. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (MKR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: QA3 Financial Corp. et al v. Financial Network Investment Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Multi-Financial Securities Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cetera Financial Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Financial Network Investment Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: QA3 Financial Corp.
Represented By: Thomas H. Dahlk
Represented By: Victoria H. Buter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: QA3 Financial, LLC
Represented By: Victoria H. Buter
Represented By: Thomas H. Dahlk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: QA3, LLC
Represented By: Victoria H. Buter
Represented By: Thomas H. Dahlk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quantum Insurance Design, LLC
Represented By: Victoria H. Buter
Represented By: Thomas H. Dahlk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?