Kleensang v. Gossett III et al
| Bernita Margaret Kleensang |
| F.A. Gossett III, Barbara Lukesh, Douglas R. Semisch and Ashley Thompson |
| 8:2012cv00181 |
| May 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| John M. Gerrard |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: This matter is dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the court's filing fee and for failure to comply with a court order. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se parties)(TCL )
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff is directed to correct the above-listed technical defect in the Complaint on or before June 22, 2012. Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this matter without further not ice. The Clerk of the court is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO240, Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: June 22, 2012: deadline for payment or filing of IFP application. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party along with the AO240 Form)(GJG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
