AXIS Capital, Inc. v. Groninger Insurance Agency, LLC et al
Plaintiff: AXIS Capital, Inc.
Defendant: Jonathan H. Groninger, Groninger Insurance Agency, LLC and James E. Groninger, II
Counter Defendant: AXIS Capital, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Jonathan H. Groninger, Groninger Insurance Agency, LLC and James E. Groninger, II
Case Number: 8:2012cv00227
Filed: June 29, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Kopf
Presiding Judge: Cheryl R. Zwart
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery/Enforcement
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 77 JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the parties' joint stipulation (filing 76 ) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a), this action, including all claims and counterclaims, is dismissed with prejudice. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (AOA)
December 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER - The parties' joint stipulation, (Filing No. 74 ), is granted. As set forth in the court's prior order, (Filing No. 67 ), all case progression deadlines are stayed. The deadlines for responding and/or replying to the pending motion for summary judgment are stayed. A telephonic conference with the undersigned magistrate judge will be held on February 4, 2014 at 11:30 a.m. to discuss the status of the parties' anticipated settlement. This conference will be cancelled if, prior to February 4, 2014, the court is notified that the case is fully settled. Counsel for Plaintiff shall place the call. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (AOA)
December 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 73 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendant's deadline to respond to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (filing 38 ) is extended to December 13, 2013. Plaintiff's deadline to reply is extended to December 27, 2013. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (AOA)
November 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER - The parties' joint motion for extension of time (filing 70 ) is granted, as follows: 1. Defendant's deadline to respond to plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (filing 38 ) is extended to December 6, 2013; and, 2. Plaintiff's deadline to reply is extended to December 20, 2013. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (AOA)
November 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 69 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The parties' joint stipulation (filing 68 ), treated as a motion, is granted as follows:1. Defendant's deadline to respond to plaintiff's motion for summaryjudgment (filing 38 ) is extended to November 22, 2013. 2. Plaintiff's deadline to reply is extended to December 6, 2013. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (AOA)
October 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 67 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The parties' joint motion to continue, (Filing No. 64 ), is granted. The unexpired progression deadlines for this case are stayed pending further order of the court. Within ten (10) days following the court's ruling on the pending motion for summary judgment, counsel for the parties shall contact my chambers to set a conference call for discussing and setting further case progression deadlines. The clerk shall set a case management deadline of February 5, 2014 for monitoring the progression of this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (AOA)
August 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's motion for a protective order (filing 41 ) is denied. Defendants' Rule 56(d) motion (filing 44 ) is granted, as follows: a. On or before October 25, 2013, Plaintiff may file a supplemental brief and supp lemental index of evidence in support of its motion for summary judgment (filing 38 ); b. On or before November 15, 2013, Defendants shall respond to Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment (filing 38 ); and c. Plaintiff may reply to Defendants' response within the time prescribed by rule.The court's final progression order (filing 34 ) shall remain in full force and effect. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (AOA)
June 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's deadline to respond to Defendants' discovery requests is continued until further order of the court. Defendants' deadline to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (filing 38 ) is continued until further order of the court. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (AOA)
October 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER - The parties' joint stipulation (filing 25 ), treated as an unopposed motion for enlargement of time, is granted, as follows: Defendants shall have until November 13, 2012, to respond to Plaintiffs motion to dismiss (filing 20 ). Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (AOA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AXIS Capital, Inc. v. Groninger Insurance Agency, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: AXIS Capital, Inc.
Represented By: Russell A. Westerhold
Represented By: Robert W. Futhey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AXIS Capital, Inc.
Represented By: Russell A. Westerhold
Represented By: Robert W. Futhey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Jonathan H. Groninger
Represented By: Matthew W. Sparks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Groninger Insurance Agency, LLC
Represented By: Matthew W. Sparks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: James E. Groninger, II
Represented By: Matthew W. Sparks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jonathan H. Groninger
Represented By: Matthew W. Sparks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Groninger Insurance Agency, LLC
Represented By: Matthew W. Sparks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James E. Groninger, II
Represented By: Matthew W. Sparks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?