Kuehl v. Jefferson Pilot Financial et al
| Plaintiff: |
Terrence Kuehl |
| Defendant: |
Jefferson Pilot Financial and Lincoln Financial Group |
| Case Number: |
8:2012cv00260 |
| Filed: |
July 30, 2012 |
| Court: |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| Office: |
8 Omaha Office |
| Presiding Judge: |
Joseph F. Bataillon |
| Presiding Judge: |
Thomas D. Thalken |
| Nature of Suit: |
Insurance |
| Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed |
Document Text |
| October 23, 2013 |
Filing
77
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - This matter be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (AOA)
|
| July 8, 2013 |
Filing
56
ORDER - The plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Designate Expert Witness (Filing no. 46 ) is granted. The plaintiff shall have until July 15, 2013, to provide a complete report as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B). The defendant's Mot ion to Strike Plaintiffs Designation of Expert Witness (Filing No. 52 ) is granted in part and denied in part. The defendant shall have until August 7, 2013, to disclose an expert witness and provide a report as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)( 2). The motion is denied in all other respects. Motions for summary judgment shall be filed not later than August 14, 2013. All other deadlines remain as scheduled. See Filing Nos. 41 and 44 . Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)
|
| May 3, 2013 |
Filing
44
AMENDED ORDER SETTING FINAL SCHEDULE FOR PROGRESSION OF CASE - granting 43 Motion to Extend. Jury Trial set for 12/16/2013 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 3, Roman L. Hruska Federal Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, NE before Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. Pretrial Conference set for 11/22/2013 at 10:00 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (AOA)
|
| November 28, 2012 |
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Findings and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Filing No. 32 ) are adopted in their entirety. The Motion for Remand (Filing No. 11 ) is denied. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (AOA)
|
| November 8, 2012 |
Filing
32
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION - The plaintiff's Motion to Amend (Filing No. 21 ) is denied to the extent the plaintiff seeks to add Jefferson Pilot Financial Insurance Company as a defendant and granted in all other respects. The plaintiff shal l have to on or before November 21, 2012, to file the amended complaint. It is recommended to Judge Joseph F. Bataillon that: The plaintiffs Motion for Remand (Filing No. 11 ) be denied. Any objection to this Order or Findings and Recommendation shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this Order and Findings and Recommendation. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (AOA)
|
| October 24, 2012 |
Filing
31
PROTECTIVE ORDER granting 30 Motion for Protective Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL)
|
| September 27, 2012 |
Filing
23
ORDER regarding the plaintiff's 11 Motion to Remand and 21 Motion to Amend. The defendants shall have until October 10, 2012, to file a response and the plaintiff shall until October 17, 2012, to file a reply. The parties' briefs should also address the affect of the proposed amendment on the Motion for Remand and the applicability of 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1) to the insurers in this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?