Tyler v. Heavican et al
Billy Tyler |
Nebraskkk Supreme KKKourt and Michael Heavican |
Nebraska Attorney General |
8:2012cv00363 |
October 10, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Laurie Smith Camp |
Pro Se Docket |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Appeal IFP (Filing No. 17 ) is granted. Petitioner's Motion for Certificate of Appealability (Filing No. 15), is denied. without prejudice to reassertion before the Eighth Circuit. The Clerk of the court shall provide the Court of Appeals a copy of thisMemorandum and Order. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy sent as directed and mailed to pro se party)(AOA) |
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding Notice of Appeal to USCA 11 that by June 14, 2013, Petitioner must either tender the appellate filing fee or file a request to appeal in forma pauperis and an affidavit of poverty in support thereof. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case with the following text: June 14, 2013: deadline to submit IFP application or pay $455.00 filing fee. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party with form Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis) )(ADB, ) |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner shall have until May 24, 2013, to file a Motion for Certificate of Appealability and Brief in support. In the event that Petitioner fails to file a Motion and Brief, as set forth in this Memorandum and Order, the court will deny the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability without further notice. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management in this case with the following text: May 24, 2013: check for filing of Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Respondents' Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 5 ) is granted. Petitioner Billy Tyler's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing No. 1 ) is denied in all respects and this action is dismissed without prejudice. Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 8 ) is denied. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that by December 7, 2012, Respondents shall file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the fo llowing text: December 7, 2012: deadline for Respondents to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment; If Respondents elect to file a motion for summary judgment or an answer, the followingprocedures outlined in the order shall be followed by Respondents and Petitioner; The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: January 7, 2013: check for Respondents to file answer and separate brief; and No discovery shall be undertaken without leave of the court. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(copy mailed to respondents)(ADB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.