Factory Mutual Insurance Company v Rasmussen Mechanical
Plaintiff: Factory Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant: Rasmussen Mechanical
Case Number: 8:2012cv00399
Filed: November 15, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Laurie Smith Camp
Presiding Judge: F.A. Gossett
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery/Enforcement
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER TO DESTROY EXHIBITS from Jury Trial held on 5/20/2014. Pursuant NECivR 79.1(f) or NECrimR 55.1(g), if counsel fails to show cause why the exhibits should not be destroyed, the clerks office is directed to destroy the above- listed exhibits 14 days from the date of this order. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (MLF, )
April 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER RE: TRIAL PREPARATION (CIVIL JURY TRIAL). Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (JB)
February 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER IN LIMINE - IT IS ORDERED: Defendant Rasmussen Mechanical, Inc.'s Motions in Limine (Filing No. 40 ) are granted in part, as follows: a. Jurors will be permitted to take notes at trial, following opening statements of counsel; b. The pa rties' fact witnesses will be sequestered during the presentation of evidence, consistent with Fed. R. Evid. 615, but witnesses providing solely expert testimony will not be sequestered; c. The parties will make no reference to the "financi al condition" of either party; d. To the extent that any settlement discussions have taken place between the parties, no reference will be made to such discussions, consistent with Fed. R. Evid. 408; e. Plaintiff Factory Mutual Insurance Company , Inc., will be precluded from making reference to any insurance coverage that Defendant Rasmussen Mechanical, Inc., may or may not have, applicable to the claims presented in this matter; and The Motions in Limine (Filing No. 40 ) are otherwise denied, without prejudice to the Defendant asserting objections at the time of trial. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (TCL )
December 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER. Due to a recent change in her schedule, Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp is not available for trial during the week of 2/18/2014. Therefore, the Jury Trial is rescheduled to 5/20/2014 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2, Roman L. Hruska Federal Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, NE before Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. The Pretrial Conference is moved to 4/28/2014 at 09:30 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (ARL, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Factory Mutual Insurance Company v Rasmussen Mechanical
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Factory Mutual Insurance Company
Represented By: Patrick R. Guinan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rasmussen Mechanical
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?