Greis Trucking & Excavating, Inc. v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 29, 2014
ORDER that on or before 8/15/14, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation). Absent compliance with this order, this case may be dismissed without further notice. The telephone conference previously scheduled for 8/1/14 is cancelled upon the representation that this case is settled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (JSF)
|April 7, 2014
ORDER - The Joint Motion to Continue Trial and Discovery (Filing No. 53 ) is granted as set forth below. Except as may be otherwise agreed by the parties and counsel, this case is stayed to permit the parties to mediate this matter. The Order S etting Final Schedule for Progression of Case (Filing No. 52 ) is termed. The deadlines will be rescheduled, if necessary, following mediation. The parties shall confer with the court in a telephone conference on August 1, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., or file a report on the status of the mediation and whether the case has been settled, whichever is first. Plaintiffs' counsel shall initiate the conference with the undersigned magistrate judge and participating counsel. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (AOA)
|November 27, 2013
PROTECTIVE ORDER denying 46 Motion for Protective Order; granting 47 Motion for Protective Order, as amended. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?