Schuldt Chiropractic Wellness Center v. Sebelius
||Schuldt Chiropractic Wellness Center
||January 4, 2013
||Nebraska District Court
||8 Omaha Office
||Laurie Smith Camp
|Nature of Suit:
||Contract: Recovery Medicare
|Cause of Action:
||42:1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 22, 2014
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- The Motion for Summary Judgment submitted by Plaintiff Schuldt Chiropractic Wellness Center ("Schuldt") (Filing No. 38 ), is denied; The Motion for Summary Judgment submitted by Defendant Kathleen Sebelius, in her c apacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS") (Filing No. 36 ), is granted; The Plaintiff's Complaint (Filing No. 1 ) is dismissed, with prejudice; and A separate Judgment will be entered. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (MKR)
|September 13, 2013
ORDER granting 29 Motion to Extend. Motions for summary judgment shall be filed by October 30, 2013. Briefs responsive to any motion for summary judgment shall be submitted no later than November 22, 2013. Reply briefs shall be submitted no later than December 9, 2013. Discovery in this case remains stayed. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (ADB)
|July 12, 2013
ORDER granting 26 Motion to Extend. Motions for summary judgment shall be filed by September 16, 2013. Briefs responsive to any motion for summary judgment shall be submitted no later than October 16, 2013. Reply briefs shall be submitted no later than October 30, 2013. Discovery in this case remains stayed. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (ADB)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?