H & Q Properties, Inc. et al v. Doll et al
Mark Houlton, H & Q Properties, Inc. and John Quandahl |
Nebraska Lowboy Services, Inc., HNGC, Inc., Double D Properties, L.L.C., Double D Excavating, Inc., DDE, Inc. and David E. Doll |
8:2013cv00038 |
January 30, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Laurie Smith Camp |
F.A. Gossett |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 161 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Motions to Dismiss (Filing Nos. 125 , 129 , 131 , and 148 ) are granted; This case is dismissed, with prejudice as to Plaintiffs' first three causes of action filed under Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizatio ns Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq., and without prejudice as to its remaining claims; The Alternative Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (Filing No. 149 ), is denied; and A separate judgment will be entered. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (MKR) |
Filing 140 ORDER granting 138 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Serve Summons by Leaving/First Class Mail. Plaintiffs shall serve Defendant Load Rite Excavating, LLC by leaving such process at said Defendant's principal and designated office and the a ddress of said Defendants registered agent, 8501 North 180th Street, Bennington, Nebraska 68007, and by mailing a copy of same by first-class mail to said address. Additionally, Plaintiffs shall serve said Defendant by publication in the manner and form provided by the statutes of the State of Nebraska. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (JSF) |
Filing 136 PROTECTIVE ORDER granting 135 Motion for Protective Order. Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Subpoena Production 127 , which is regarding the materials covered by this Protective Order that the MCL Entities have now purportedly agreed to produce, is denied as moot. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (JSF) |
Filing 68 ORDER granting 65 Defendants' Motion for Additional Time to Supplement Discovery Responses. Defendants shall supplement their responses by or before 11/12/13. Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel 48 is denied without prejudice to reassertion following receipt of Defendants' supplemental discovery responses. The parties' deadline to amend pleadings and/or add parties is extended to 12/31/2013. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (JSF) |
Filing 60 ORDER that Robert Peterson was granted leave to withdrawas counsel for Defendants (filing 59 ). Accordingly, Defendant David Doll is now deemed to be proceeding pro se, that is, without the assistance of counsel. Defendant David Doll may retain sub stitute counsel at any time. However, until such time as substitute counsel enters a written appearance, Defendant David Doll shall comply with all orders of this Court, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice. Defend ants Double D Properties, LLC, DDE, Inc., f/k/a Double D Excavating, Inc., HNGC, Inc., f/k/a Double D Hook-N-Go Containers, Inc., Nebraska Lowboy Services, Inc. and Double D Excavating, Inc. cannot litigate this action in this forum without repres entation by licensed counsel. Therefore, on or before October 25, 2013, these Defendants shall obtain the services of counsel and have that attorney file an appearance of their behalf, in the absence of which the Court may file an entry and/or judgment of default without further notice. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (Copy mailed to pro se party and defendants)(ADB, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.