Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
| Young Yil Jo |
| Barack Obama and Six Unknown Names Agents |
| 8:2013cv00048 |
| February 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Laurie Smith Camp |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff's Complaint 1 is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to comply with this court's orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff is directed to correct the above-listed technical defect in the Complaint on or before March 19, 2013. Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice . The Clerk of the court is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO240, Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit. The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: March 19, 2013: deadline for payment or filing of IFP application. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Cope mailed as directed to pro se party) (JSF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
