Winkler v. Price et al
Vicky Winkler |
Tara P. Chicatelli, Donald R. Fogle, James A. Hoffman, A. Donald Janezic, Jr., Charles W. Luke, Jamie C. Meadows, Eileen S.H. Morris, Rhonda L. Pierce, Stephen J. Price, Scott A. Shuey, Thomas E. Wakefield and Vicky Wilkey |
Patricia Fahey |
U.S. Bankruptcy Court |
8:2013cv00052 |
February 14, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Joseph F. Bataillon |
F.A. Gossett |
Bankruptcy Withdrawl |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1334 ab Civil Proceeding (BK) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - This matter is before the Court on the joint stipulation of the parties, Filing No. 59. Being fully advised in the premises, the Court hereby orders that the Plaintiff's claims against Stephen J. Price, Tara P. Chicatelli and Jamie C. Meadows are dismissed, with prejudice, with each party to pay their own attorney fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL ) |
Filing 58 ORDER that on or before August 3, 2015, the parties shall electronically file a joint stipulation for dismissal (or other dispositive stipulation) and shall submit to Senior District Judge Joseph F. Bataillon a draft order which will fully dispose of the case. Absent compliance with this order, this case (including all counterclaims and the like) may be dismissed without further notice. The final pretrial conference set for July 27, 2015, is cancelled upon the representation that this case is settled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (MBM) |
Filing 55 ORDER granting 54 Stipulation for Dismissal. The Plaintiff's claims against Thomas E. Wakefield, Donald R. Fogle, Rhonda L. Pierce, A. Donald Janezic, Vicky Wilkey, Scott A. Shuey, Eileen S. H. Morris, James A. Hoffmann, and Charles W. Luke are dismissed, with prejudice. Nothing in this Order affects the Plaintiff's claims against Stephen J. Price, Tara P. Chicatelli and Jamie C. Meadows. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB) |
Filing 48 SECOND AMENDED ORDER SETTING FINAL SCHEDULE FOR PROGRESSION OF CASE, granting 47 Stipulated Motion to Alter Deadlines. Deposition deadline set for 5/1/2015. Pretrial conference set for 7/27/2015 at 9:30 A.M., in chambers before Magistrate Judge F .A. Gossett. A jury trial before the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon is set for the week of 8/24/2015 at 8:30 A.M., in Courtroom 3 of the Roman L. Hruska U. S. Federal Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (ARL, ) |
Filing 44 AMENDED ORDER SETTING FINAL SCHEDULE FOR PROGRESSION OF CASE, granting 43 Stipulated Motion to Extend. Pretrial Conference set for 3/6/2015 at 09:30 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. Jury Trial set for 3/23/2015 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 3, Roman L. Hruska Federal Courthouse, 111 South 18th Plaza, Omaha, NE before Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (ARL, ) |
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The defendants' motions to dismiss (Filing Nos. 7 and 12 ) are denied. The plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint alleging negligent misrepresentation with requisite specificity within 14 days of the date of this order. The plaintiffs objection (Filing No. 19 ) to the evidence submitted in connection with the defendants' reply is overruled. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.