Intercall, Inc. v. Examination Management Services, Inc.
| Intercall, Inc. |
| Examination Management Services, Inc. |
| 8:2013cv00175 |
| June 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Laurie Smith Camp |
| F.A. Gossett |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
ORDER - Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and to Join a Necessary and Indispensable and/or Proper Party (filing 63 ) is denied. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -The Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the alternative, Partial Summary Judgment (Filing No. 22 ) filed by Plaintiff InterCall, Inc., is denied; The Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Filing No. 25 ) filed by Defendant Examination Management Services, Inc., is granted in part, as follows: a. The Court finds that InterCall failed to deliver or implement the Rapid Learning enhancements as promised in the InterCall Order Form and thereby breached the terms of the InterCall Order Form; b. The Motion is otherwise denied; and The Motions to Strike (Filing Nos. 28 and 44 ) filed by Defendant Examination Management Services, Inc., and the Motion to Strike (Filing No. 31 ) filed by Plaintiff InterCall, Inc., are denied as moot, without prejudice to reassertion. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR PROGRESSION OF CASE - The provisions of the court's earlier, initial progression order remain in effect, and in addition to those provisions, the following shall apply: 1. Motions for Partial Summary Judgment. Motions for partial summaryjudgment shall be filed not later than May 9, 2014. See NECivR 56.1 and 7.0.1. 2. Motions to Alter Dates. All requests for changes of deadlines shall be directedto the magistrate judge by appropriate motion. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (AOA)
|
|
Filing
17
PROTECTIVE ORDER on 16 Stipulation. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (MKR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Intercall, Inc. v. Examination Management Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Examination Management Services, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Ryan A. Steen |
| Represented By: | Michael J. Mills |
| Represented By: | Scott E. Daniel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Intercall, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Patrick R. Guinan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
