Perez v. Saale et al
| Thomas E. Perez |
| James Bohlken and Diane Saale |
| 8:2013cv00192 |
| June 27, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| John M. Gerrard |
| Cheryl R. Zwart |
| Labor: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 651 Occupational Safety/Health |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER regarding 1 Motion to Compel and Motion to Dismiss 10 . Based upon the representations of the parties,1) Defendants will agree to submit to an interview at a time mutually agreed upon by the parties. By agreeing to be interviewed, the d efendants are not waiving any defenses based on the statute of limitations for current or future citations issued by the Occupational Health and Safety Administration.2) The parties shall report to the court no more than five (5) days after the i nterviews are completed to address any outstanding issues related to the pending motions.3) The court will reserve a final ruling on the motions until it receives the parties' status report and any outstanding issues are addressed.4) Tho mas E. Perez, the newly appointed Secretary of Labor, is substituted for Seth Harris, the former Acting Secretary of Labor, as the plaintiff. All future captions for documents filed of record herein shall reflect this change. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
