Woodruff v. Douglas County Correctional Center et al
| Johnny R. Woodruff |
| Dr. Morin, Mark Foxall, Douglas County Correctional Center and "Tammy" |
| 8:2013cv00285 |
| September 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Pro Se Docket |
| Richard G. Kopf |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- Plaintiff's Complaint 1 is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to comply with this court's orders and local rules. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party ) (MKR)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff Johnny R. Woodruff shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $42.30 by October 31, 2013, unless an enlargement of time is granted in response to a wri tten motion. The Clerk of the court is directed to send a copy of this order to theappropriate official at Plaintiffs institution. Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 10/31/2013: initial partial filing fee payment due. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party and to plaintiff's institution)(MKR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
