Larsen v. Colvin
| Lorie Larsen |
| Carolyn W. Colvin |
| Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
| 8:2013cv00313 |
| October 14, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Warren K. Urbom |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 Review of HHS Decision |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER AND JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the memorandum opinion 21 entered herein this date, IT IS ORDERED that the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is affirmed. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER - IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that: 1. the plaintiff's Motion to Extend Brief Deadline, ECF No. 10 , is granted; 2. the plaintiff shall have on or before May 7, 2014, in which to file and serve her brief in support of plaintiff's posit ion; 3. the defendant shall have 35 days from the date on which the plaintiff's brief is filed in which to file an answer brief; 4. within one week after the defendant's answer brief is filed, the plaintiff may file and serve a reply brief; and 5. the case shall be deemed to be submitted at the expiration of the time period specified in paragraph 4 hereof. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (GJG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
