Heim v. BNSF Railway Company
| Kelly Heim |
| BNSF Railway Company |
| 8:2013cv00369 |
| December 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| John M. Gerrard |
| Cheryl R. Zwart |
| Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
ORDER denying 73 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 97 Motion for Summary Judgment. Heim's motion for partial summary judgment is denied. BNSF's motion for summary judgment is granted. A separate judgment will be entered. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (DCD)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER that the pretrial conference scheduled for March 24, 2015 and jury trial scheduled for April 6, 2015 are continued pending further order of the court. If this case is not fully resolved by summary judgment, within ten (10) days after the summary judgment ruling, the parties shall contact the undersigned magistrate judge's chambers to re-schedule the pretrial conference and trial. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (ADB)
|
|
Filing
92
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - After hearing held on February 18, 2015,1) The railroad's motion to strike, (Filing No. 82 ), is denied;2) The plaintiff's motion for leave to file a reply, (Filing No. 85 ), is granted;3) The railroad&# 039;s motion to compel, (Filing No. 51 ) is denied;4) The plaintiff's motion to amend the final progression order, (Filing No. 78 ), is denied; and5) The railroad's motion for protective order, (Filing No. 59 ), is granted.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER - After conferring with counsel, The defendant's anticipated motion for protective order regarding plaintiff's 30(b)(6) deposition notice shall be filed on or before January 9, 2015. The plaintiff's response to that motion shall be filed on or before January 16, 2015, with any reply due on or before January 23, 2015... Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER denying 34 Motion to Compel. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (BHC)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER that Attorney John Inserra has a pending case in this court and has not paid the 2013/2014 Attorney Assessment. Within 30 days from the date of this order, Mr. Inserra is directed to pay the $20.00 fee or show cause why he is unable to do so. Show Cause Deadline set for 6/27/2014. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (MTB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Heim v. BNSF Railway Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BNSF Railway Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kelly Heim | |
| Represented By: | Russell A. Ingebritson |
| Represented By: | John P. Inserra |
| Represented By: | Matthew H. Morgan |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Thompson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
