Royal Bank of Canada v. Central Plains Energy Project
Royal Bank of Canada |
Central Plains Energy Project |
8:2014cv00028 |
January 30, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Lyle E. Strom |
Thomas D. Thalken |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 ORDER that the stipulation of the parties 30 is approved and adopted. The motion for dismissal with prejudice is granted. Plaintiff's complaint and defendant's counterclaim are dismissed with prejudice. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JSF) |
Filing 29 ORDER granting 28 Stipulation. The deadlines and dates contained in paragraphs 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 11 of the Final Progression Order are stayed until a new Progression Order is entered by the Court. The parties shall maintain the status quo duri ng the pendency of the above-captioned matter by continuing their respective performances under the terms of the Prepaid Natural Gas Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "Prepaid Agreement") and all related agreements. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (ADB) |
Filing 27 ORDER granting the 26 Joint MOTION for Protective Order. The stipulated protective order is approved and adopted by the Court as if fully set forth herein. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MKR) |
Filing 14 ORDER - Scheduling Conference set for 4/23/2014 08:15 AM in Chambers before Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (TCL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.