Sammons et al v. COR Clearing et al

Plaintiff: Michael Sammons and Elena Sammons
Defendant: Cede & Co., COR Clearing and The Depository Trust Company
Case Number: 8:2014cv00136
Filed: April 28, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bataillon
Presiding Judge: Thomas D. Thalken
Nature of Suit: Stockholders Suits
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiffs' motions for partial summary judgment (Filing No. 6 & Filing No. 8 ) are denied as moot. Defendant COR Clearing's motion to dismiss (Filing No. 24 ) is granted. Defendants Cede & Co.'s and The Depository Trust Company's motion to dismiss (Filing No. 27) is granted. This action is dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)
June 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER denying Michael Sammons' motions seeking review of the Clerk of Court's text orders (Filing Nos. 11 and 16). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL)
May 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting 18 the defendants' Emergency Joint Motion For Extension or, in the alternative, Emergency Motion to Stay (Filing No. 18) as follows: 1. The deadlines for the defendants to respond to Mr. Sammons' Motions for Partial Summary Judgment (Filing Nos. 6 and 8) are stayed pending a ruling on the defendants' motion to dismiss in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, China Energy Corporation v. Alan T. Hill, et al., 3:13CV562, (D. Nev.), or upon further order of this court. 2. The defendants shall file their motions to dismiss in this case within ten (10) business days of this Order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (BJC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sammons et al v. COR Clearing et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Sammons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elena Sammons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cede & Co.
Represented By: Patrick E. Brookhouser, Jr.
Represented By: Lauren R. Goodman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COR Clearing
Represented By: Gillian G. O'Hara
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Depository Trust Company
Represented By: Patrick E. Brookhouser, Jr.
Represented By: Lauren R. Goodman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?