Tyler v. Coffey et al
Plaintiff: Billy Tyler
Defendant: Coffey and John Friend
Case Number: 8:2014cv00209
Filed: July 21, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Presiding Judge: John M. Gerrard
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that this matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
December 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Plaintiff Tyler will have 30 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order in which to file an amended complaint that states a claim upon which relief can be granted. Failure to file an amended complaint or failure to sufficiently amend his c laims will result in dismissal of this action with prejudice for the reasons discussed in the paragraphs above. The clerks office is directed to set the following case management deadline in this matter: January 12, 2015: Check for amended complaint. ( Case Management Deadline set for 1/12/2015.) Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MLF, )
September 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB)
September 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff has failed to include the $400.00 filing and administrative fees. Plaintiff has the choice of either tendering the $400.00 fees to the Clerk of the Court or submitting a request to proceed in forma paup eris and an affidavit of poverty in support thereof. Plaintiff is directed to correct the above-listed technical defect in the Complaint within 30 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. Failure to comply as directed will result in di smissal of this case for want of prosecution. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO240, Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: October 6, 2014: Check for MIFP or payment. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party with Form AO240 as directed)(ADB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tyler v. Coffey et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coffey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Friend
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Billy Tyler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?