Nelson v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nebraska
| Lynn R. Nelson |
| Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nebraska |
| 8:2014cv00228 |
| August 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Thomas D. Thalken |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: This matter came before the Court on Plaintiff's Dismissal with Prejudice, Filing No. 104. The Court has been advised by the plaintiff that the defendants likewise agree to the dismissal. Being fully advised in the premises, this Court finds that this matter should be dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay its own fees and costs. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that the above-captioned case is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)
|
|
Filing
95
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that plaintiff's motions to strike (Filing No. 56 and Filing No. 86 ) are denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)
|
|
Filing
94
AMENDED ORDER SETTING FINAL SCHEDULE FOR PROGRESSION OF CASE- The parties' Joint Motion to Continue Trial Date and Related Deadlines 93 is granted. Non-Jury Trial set to commence, at the court's call, during the week of 3/21/2016 before Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. The Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/22/2016 at 10:00 AM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER - This matter is before the court following the filing of the parties' Rule 26(f) report 36 . The defendants shall have to on or before January 23, 2015, in which to serve a copy of the administrative record upon the plaintiff and file a notice of such service. The notice filed shall be accompanied by a RESTRICTED Index of a copy of the administrative record which was served upon the plaintiff. The court will conduct another telephone planning conference with counsel at 9:00 a.m. on February 2, 2015. Plaintiffs counsel shall initiate the telephone conference with participating counsel and the undersigned magistrate judge. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER granting 16 the plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint. The plaintiff shall have until October 9, 2014, to file the Amended Complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nelson v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nebraska | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nebraska | |
| Represented By: | Thomas E. Johnson |
| Represented By: | Nicholas K. Rudman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lynn R. Nelson | |
| Represented By: | Jason M. Bruno |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
