Glasgow v. State of Nebraska Department of Corrections et al
Velita Glasgow |
Dr. Natalie Baker, City of Omaha, John Doe Defendants 1-100, Correct Care Solutions, County of Douglas, John Doe Defendants 1-100, Robert Houston, Dr. Randy Kohl, State of Nebraska Department of Corrections and Cameron White |
8:2014cv00244 |
August 18, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Laurie Smith Camp |
F.A. Gossett |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 ORDER granting 33 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff may proceed on appeal without prepayment of costs. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JSF) |
Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MBM) |
Filing 24 ORDER granting 23 Motion to Extend. Plaintiff shall have until 01/23/2015 to reply to defendants motions to dismiss. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (MBM) |
Filing 22 ORDER granting 21 Motion to Extend. Plaintiff shall have until 1/15/2015 to reply to defendants' motion to dismiss. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (JSF) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court shall file the original complaint and the accompanying pleadings without the prepayment of costs or fees. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (JSF) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.