Gateway Customer Solutions, LLC v. GC Services Limited Partnership
| Gateway Customer Solutions, LLC |
| GC Services Limited Partnership |
| 8:2014cv00353 |
| November 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Thomas D. Thalken |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER - The plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 26 ) is denied. The defendant's Counter-Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 38 ) is granted. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, a separate judgment will be entered on this date in accordance with this Order. The defendant's Motion to Proceed Without a Resident Attorney (Filing No. 47 ) is denied as moot. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER - This matter is before the court on the defendant's Motion for Extension to File Responses to Plaintiff's Request for Production (Filing No. 32 ). The plaintiff has advised the court it does not object to the motion. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the defendant's motion is granted and the defendant's responses are due on February 10, 2015. IT IS SO ORDERED. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (GJG)
|
|
Filing
16
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
