Golden v. Department of Corrections et al
Kelly Marinus Golden |
Mark Boyer, Department of Corrections, James Ellinger, Matt Heckman, Jason Hurt, Randy Kohl, Judge Teresa Luther, Marshall Lux, Jerall Moreland, Mario Peart, Kyle J. Poppert, Nurse C. Prokop, Diane J. Sabatka-Rine, Cathy Sheair, Unit Manager Davis, Larry Wayne and Curtis Wees |
8:2015cv00147 |
April 27, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Pro Se Docket |
John M. Gerrard |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC) |
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Plaintiff's lawsuit for money damages against defendant Nebraska Department of Corrections is dismissed with prejudice based on Eleventh Amendment immunity. Judgment dismissing this case shall be entered by separate document. Plaintiff's motion to clarify (Filing No. 21 ) the court's order (Filing No. 20 ) allowing Plaintiff to proceed without payment of fees is denied as moot. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC) |
Filing 20 ORDER that leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Filing No. 14 ) is provisionally granted, and the Complaint shall be filed without payment of fees. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC) |
Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Plaintiff shall have 30 days in which to file an amended complaint. As set forth above, Plaintiff's amended complaint must: (a) explain what each defendant did to him, when the defendant did it, and how the defendan t's actions harmed him; and (b) set forth only related claims that stem from the same basic events or occurrences. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: March 4, 2016: Check for amended complaint. The court will conduct further review of Plaintiff's amended complaint, should he file one, to determine whether summary dismissal of the amended complaint is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP (Filing No. 2 ) is granted. Plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of $9.75 within 30 days, unless the court extends the time in which he has to pay in respon se to a written motion. After payment of the initial partial filing fee, Plaintiff's institution must collect the additional monthly payments in the manner set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), quoted above, and forward those payments to t he court. The clerk of the court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appropriate official at Plaintiffs institution. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: Ju ne 8, 2015: initial partial filing fee payment due. Plaintiff is advised that, following payment of the initial partial filing fee, the next step in Plaintiff's case will be for the court to conduct an initial review of Plaintiff's cla ims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party and as directed)(GJG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.