Armendariz v. Frakes
Petitioner: Jonathon L. Armendariz
Respondent: Scott R. Frakes
Interested Party: Nebraska Attorney General
Case Number: 8:2015cv00161
Filed: May 4, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Laurie Smith Camp
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Petitioner's Motion to Reopen Judgment (Filing No. 17 ) and Motion for Order Extending Time for Appeal (Filing No. 18 ) are denied. Petitioner's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 16 ) is denied. The clerk of court shall forward a copy of this order to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
May 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - This matter is dismissed with prejudice, and a separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. The court will not issue a certificate of appealability in this matter. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
August 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Upon initial review of the petition (Filing No. 1 ), the court preliminarily determines that Petitioner's claim is potentially cognizable in federal court. The clerk of the court is directed to mail copies of this Mem orandum and Order and the petition to Respondent and the Nebraska Attorney General by regular first-class mail. By September 22, 2015, Respondent must file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The clerk of t he court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: September 22, 2015: deadline for Respondent to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. If Respondent elects to file an answer, the procedures must be followed by Respondent and Petitioner. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: October 20, 2015: check for Respondent's answer an d separate brief. No discovery shall be undertaken without leave of the court. See Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party; Order and Petition mailed to Respondent as directed )(GJG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Armendariz v. Frakes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jonathon L. Armendariz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Scott R. Frakes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Nebraska Attorney General
Represented By: Douglas J. Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?