Johnson v. Tamarin Lodging, LLC
Plaintiff: Nancy Johnson
Defendant: Tamarin Lodging, LLC
Case Number: 8:2015cv00174
Filed: May 20, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 8 Omaha Office
Presiding Judge: Laurie Smith Camp
Presiding Judge: F.A. Gossett
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER AND JUDGMENT that the Defendant's motion to dismiss and for sanctions is granted. Plaintiff's action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Defendant's motion for sanctions is granted. The Court will award defendant its reasonable expenses and attorney's fees incurred in bringing the February 15, 2016, Motion to Compel and the defendant's motion to dismiss and for sanctions. Defendant shall present to the Court a proposal of reasonable expenses and a ttorney's fees within 14 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff shall have fourteen days to respond to defendant's proposal in accordance with NECivR 71.(b)(1)(B). All other pending motions are denied as moot. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
May 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER that the motion to withdraw (Filing No. 33 ) is granted ; Thomas A. Ukinski, Katie S. Thurber, and Justin C. Valencia are deemed withdrawn as counsel for the Nebraska Commissioner of Labor. The clerk of court shall remove their names from CM/ECF. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
February 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER that Defendant's Motion to Compel Discovery and to Extend Remaining Deadlines (filing 27 ) is granted. Plaintiff shall respond to Plaintiff's discovery requests no later than March 19, 2016. Depositions shall be completed by June 15, 2016. The Final Pretrial Conference with the undersigned is set for November 21, 2016, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom No. 6, 111 South 18th Plaza,Roman L. Hruska, United States Courthouse, Omaha, Nebraska. A jury trial will commence, at the Court's call, during the week of December 20, 2016, in Omaha, Nebraska, before Chief District Court Judge Laurie Smith Camp. All other provisions in the Court's Order Setting Final Schedule for Progression of Case (filing 21 ) remain unchanged. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff at her last known address. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
December 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER that the Motion to Withdraw (filing 24 ) is granted. Ms. Neary shall immediately serve copies of this Order on Plaintiff and thereafter file proof of service showing compliance with this Order, listing the name and address of the person to who m notice was sent. Ms. Neary will not be relieved of applicable duties to the Court, Plaintiff, and opposing counsel until proof of service is filed. Upon the filing of proof of service pursuant to Paragraph 2 of this Order, Plaintiff will be deemed to be proceeding pro se, that is, without the assistance of counsel, unless substitute counsel has entered a written appearance on her behalf. If substitute counsel has not entered a written appearance, Plaintiff shall file a written notice with the Clerk of the Court of Plaintiff's current address and telephone number within five (5) business days of being served with this Order. Plaintiff may retain substitute counsel at any time. However, until such time as substitute counsel enters a w ritten appearance, Plaintiff shall comply with all orders of this Court, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in the imposition of sanctions, including payment of costs and attorney's fees and/or the entry of default. Upon Ms. Neary's submission of proof of service as described in Paragraph2 of this Order, the Clerk of Court shall terminate Ms. Neary's appearance ascounsel and cease further notices to her in this matter. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (LAC)
October 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER that the Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (filing 10 ) is granted and the Nebraska Department of Labors Objection to Subpoena Dues Tecum (filing 13 ) is overruled. Provided Plaintiff has paid the required search and cost per page fees for t he requested records, on or before November 6, 2015, the Nebraska Department of Labor shall produce the documents and items referenced in the Subpoena. The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this Order to counsel for the Nebraska Department of Labor. Ordered by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. (Copies mailed as directed) (LAC, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Tamarin Lodging, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nancy Johnson
Represented By: Kathleen M. Neary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tamarin Lodging, LLC
Represented By: Cristin M. Berkhausen
Represented By: Tara A. Stingley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?