Graham Construction et al v. Markel American Insurance
| Arch Insurance Group and Graham Construction |
| Markel American Insurance |
| 8:2015cv00276 |
| July 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
| 8 Omaha Office |
| Laurie Smith Camp |
| F.A. Gossett |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiffs Graham Construction, Inc. and Arch Insurance Co.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 22 ) is denied; Defendant Markel American Insurance Co.s Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 26) is granted; Grah am Construction, Inc. is not an insured under the Markel Policy for purposes of Guadalupe Gaytan, Special Administrator of the Estate of Jose Sanchez-Dominguez v. Wal-Mart, et al., District Court of Douglas County, Nebraska, No. CI 10-9387269; Ma rkel American Insurance Co. does not owe Plaintiffs Graham Construction, Inc. and Arch Insurance Co. defense or indemnity for purposes of Guadalupe Gaytan, Special Administrator of the Estate of Jose Sanchez-Dominguez v. Wal-Mart, et al., District Court of Douglas County, Nebraska, No. CI 10-9387269; The above-captioned is dismissed with prejudice; and A separate judgment will be entered. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (MKR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
