Harper v. NE DOC
Clyde Ernest Harper |
NE DOC |
Nebraska Attorney General |
8:2015cv00301 |
August 13, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Nebraska |
8 Omaha Office |
Joseph F. Bataillon |
Pro Se Docket |
Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (Filing No. 15 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG) |
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's petition is dismissed with prejudice, and the court will not issue a certificate of appealability in this matter. The court will enter a separate judgment in accordance with this order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that upon initial review of the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 6 , the court preliminarily determines that Petitioner's claim, as it is set forth in this Memorandum and Order, is potentially cognizable in fe deral court. By March 24, 2016, Respondent must file a motion for summary judgment or state court records in support of an answer. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: M arch 24, 2016: deadline for Respondent to file state court records in support of answer or motion for summary judgment. The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: April 26, 2016: check for Respondent's answer and separate brief. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(copy mailed with the amended habeas corpus petition to Respondent and the Nebraska Attorney General) (ADB) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Harper is directed to file an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus within 30 days in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. To avoid confusion, any document Harper sends to the clerk o f the court for filing in this case must clearly display the case number. Failure to comply with this Memorandum and Order will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to send to Harper the Form AO241 ("Petition for Relief From a Conviction or Sentence By a Person in State Custody"). The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: February 22, 2016: Check for am ended petition. Harper's request for the appointment of counsel (Filing No. 4 ) will be denied at this time. As a general rule, counsel will not be appointed unless the case is unusually complex or the petitioner's ability to investigate and articulate the claims is unusually impaired or an evidentiary hearing is required. See, e.g., Morris v. Dormire, 217 F.3d 556, 558-59 (8th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 984 (2000); Hoggard v. Purkett, 29 F.3d 469, 471 (8th Cir. 1994). Se e also Rule 8(c) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts (requiring appointment of counsel if an evidentiary hearing is warranted). The court has carefully reviewed the record and finds there is no need for the appointment of counsel at this time. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Petitioner is directed to submit the $5.00 fee to the clerk's office or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Failure to take either action will result in dismissal of this matter with out further notice. The clerk of the court is directed to send to Petitioner the Form AO240("Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit"). The clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: September 17, 2015: Check for MIFP or payment. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party with Form AO240) (ADB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.